Sujet: Religious Freedom
De: tothesource
Date: 08 Dec 2005 16:54:39 -0800

If you are having trouble viewing this email, click here.
December 8, 2005

Dear Concerned Citizen,

by Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse

Is it ok to say Merry Christmas?

Back in December of 2003, I wrote about how Christians ought to respond to the annual cleansing of the public square of Christian symbols. I suggested Christians set up religious Christmas displays on our own property. I had been inspired by The Bethlehem Experience, an annual re-creation of the sights and sounds of Bethlehem as it might have been at the birth of Christ.

I can report Bad News and Good News on the Christmas front of the Culture Wars. First, the bad news: this year, somebody got in trouble for a nativity scene in their own yard.

A family in Novi, Michigan, was threatened with fines by the management company of their subdivision unless they removed the nativity scene from their own front lawn. The Samona family has lived in the home for three years, and has displayed their creche each year. This year, the company informed them that they could be fined up to $100 per week until the display was removed.

But here is the good news: Christians are fighting back, and winning. In this particular instance, the Samona family contacted the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm located in Ann Arbor, MI. After receiving a letter from attorneys at the Thomas More Law Center, the management company quickly backed down. They even apologized for any distress they had caused, and offered to give the family a gift basket as a token of their remorse.

The Supreme Court has created a tremendous amount of confusion on the issue of public displays of Christianity through its complex and seemingly contradictory sets of rulings. That confusion can cause people to withdraw from the fray, simply out of fear of being sued or fined. But if you are unwilling to be intimidated, you may find that you are perfectly within your rights to do what you had planned.

For instance, the school district in Jackson County Georgia had prohibited a whole variety of religious expressions. The district had prohibited teachers from wearing pins, angels, crosses, or clothing that had religious connotations. The district had removed certain religious songs from a "Winter concert," and censored the word "God" from a song.

An attorney from the Alliance Defense Fund wrote a letter to the school district, on behalf of one of the teachers. According to ADF Senior Legal Counsel David Cortman, many people are ignorant of the law. "Many school districts aren't trying to be difficult; they simply don't know the facts about the law. The fear, disinformation and intimidation that the ACLU and other groups like them have promoted over the years with regard to religious expression on public property at Christmastime have led to such misconceptions. ADF desires to educate schools, teachers and students on the truth about what the law really says."

Besides Christians standing up for themselves, non-Christians are standing up for Christmas. Jews Against Anti-Christian Defamation, was founded by Don Feder to combat the widespread prejudice against Christians by the cultural elites. As Feder noted in the organization's inaugural address:

"Jews Against Anti-Christian Defamation was organized because we recognize that Christians are the last remaining obstacle to the moral deconstruction of America, ... But the morality of Christianity is also the morality of Judaism - hence the expression Judeo-Christian ethic. By maintaining their loyalty to the eternal values revealed at Sinai, Christians have become pariahs in the eyes of the establishment, but heroes in our eyes."

Not surprisingly, this organization has spoken out against purging Christmas from the public square. As Feder points out "According to a recent Newsweek survey, 85% of this nation is Christian. (On a percentage-of-population basis, America is more Christian than Israel is Jewish -- more Christian than India is Hindu.) A FOX News poll informs us that 96% of the American people celebrate Christmas - which means a lot of non-Christians are decking the halls too. So the above de-Santa-zation process is all for 4% of the population? Not even. Many who don't celebrate Christmas have no objection to Christmas trees, carols, mangers in parks, Santas in parades or the lady at the cash register saying "Merry Christmas." I should know; I'm one of them. When I was in grade school, back in the '50s, we sang Christmas carols an d made Christmas ornaments. And, guess what - I wasn't emotionally scarred for life."

One thing is certain: the annual Christmas debate has gotten a lot more interesting.

Responses to Science Points to God:

I find it curious that people on both sides of the debate assume a contradiction between faith and science. Jesus said, "You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free." The only instance when scientific discoveries conflict with theology is when the church clings to archaic and indefensible traditional beliefs. The risk to the church is that it will become anachronistic and inconsequential if it does not abandon those concepts which do not wash with reality. - Rev. J. F.

Perhaps it is the brevity of the interview. Perhaps it is the imprecision of the questions. But I didn't find Dr. Polkinghorne's answers particularly illuminating. In fact, I found them distressingly similar to the schwaffle that keeps coming from the Templeton Foundation (of which Polkinghorne is a recipient of their prize), a "reconciliation" of science and religion by turning Christianity into something it is not. "The human soul has no natural expectation of a destiny beyond death?" If the soul is preserved by the faithfulness of God (rather than by the nature of his creation) then what do we call those souls who are preserved separated from God in Hell? But perhaps Hell is not an intellectually acceptable construct either. Like Frank Tipler and his imaginary "Omega Point" god, they craft a heterodox faith that is harmonious with their science (du jour) and then are surprised that Biblical Christians are offended. - D. N.

I have never believed Christian theology and science were in conflict [or strife] current debates over creationism, inteliigent design and evolution to the contrary. Of course, inadequate theologies are threatened by science and there are many historical examples of that. - Rev. D. M.

This man is more dangerous than your out-and-out atheist. Anyone who denies the existence of Satan as a literal being who has caused untold suffering and woe must repent and accept Jesus and be born again, as they have no concept of the Great Controversy going on between Christ and his angels and Satan and his angels. - D. W.

I edit a small local newspaper that includes many articles from Christian sources. May I include your article on John Polkinghorne in my next edition. I am working on it now. I have published articles from many other sources. I have been looking for a good article or two to print on this subject. - S. L.

Thanks for printer friendly option! - B. C.

Send your letter to the editor to

Your Name Your Email
Friend's Name Friend's Email
Click for a Printer Friendly Version
Church cancelled because of Christmas
Pro-Family Pressure Prompts Retailers to Reconsider PC 'Holiday' Policies
How A Charlie Brown Christmas Came to Pass
We live complex lives. We strive to sort out priorities that sometimes conflict or seem incompatible. A moral framework is needed to help us understand the reality around us. Our Judeo-Christian heritage provides a framework to help us comprehend the choices we make and the conflicts that arise over them. It is not only the main source of our spiritual values, but also many of the secular values we depend on.

tothesource is a forum for integrating thinking and action within a moral framework that takes into account our contemporary situation. We will report the insights of cultural experts to the specific issues we face believing these sources will embolden people to greater faith and action.
We invite you to subscribe to our free email service
that features informed opinion on current cultural issues.
  Jennifer Roback Morse
Jennifer Roback Morse is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution. She has appeared on numerous talk radio shows nationwide and is a regular columnist for the National Catholic Register. Her public policy articles have appeared in Policy Review, the American Enterprise, Fortune, Reason, the Wall Street Journal, and Religion and Liberty. From 1980 to 1996, she taught at Yale and George Mason universities. In 1996, she moved with her family to California, where she now pursues her primary vocation as a wife and mother.
tothesource, P.O. Box 1292, Thousand Oaks, CA 91358
Phone: (805) 241-3138 | Fax: (805) 241-3158 |

This email was sent to If you feel you have received this in error or you do not wish to receive future articles from us, please reply with the word REMOVE in the subject line.