Sujet: Hijacked!
De: tothesource
Date: 22 Mar 2006 14:34:14 -0800

If you are having trouble viewing this email, click here.
March 22, 2006

Dear Concerned Citizen,

by Dr. Benjamin Wiker

side bar side bar side bar side bar As we mentioned in the first email of our series, the secular worldview was not native to America.  American secular activists imported their founding ideas from Europe, from the centuries-long secular revolution that had already transformed the Old World.  In regard to higher education, our particular circumstance provided a conduit for European ideas.  America had very few graduate schools at the end of the 19th century, and so American college graduates who desired advanced degrees went to Europe, and in particular to Germany.

In Germany, American graduate students were immersed in the latest and most thorough version of European Enlightenment thought—“enlightenment” generally meaning, “having left behind the darkness of Christian superstition, for the light of science, reason, and endless human progress.”  In Europe, they studied Immanuel Kant, Georg Hegel, D. F. Strauss, Charles Darwin, Auguste Comte, Herbert Spencer and others, who either despised Christianity or radically reconstructed it according to secular purposes.  Awash with European intellectual life, which seemed manifestly superior to anything on their own shores, they returned to America, degree in hand, and ready to start a revolution.

But revolutionaries need money.  Prior to the 20th century, most American colleges were denominationally based, and hence denominationally funded.  Being tied to its particular Christian heritage, such an institution was an ill-fitted receptacle for the new wave of secular academics.  The answer to this dilemma was simply to start new universities from scratch or take over existing universities via generous endowments. These universities would be direct imitations of European universities.

This educational revolution was made possible, interestingly enough, by the enormous wealth of the most prominent American industrialists.  Some of these industrialists were quite eager to advance secular agendas.  But others, who were personally very religious, were in an important sense “duped.”  They were persuaded by secular activists that bankrolling these new secular universities was a worthy public goal, even while the activists remained silent about the underlying secular agenda.

Either way, new secular universities sprung up, financed by America’s most successful businessmen, and gained almost instant prestige: Johns Hopkins University started by Johns Hopkins, Cornell University by Ezra Cornell, the University of Chicago by John Rockefeller, Stanford University by Leland Stanford, Vanderbilt University by Cornelius Vanderbilt, and Duke University by James Duke, to name a few.

Starting from scratch with endowments beyond the wildest dreams of any denominational college meant that these new secular universities would dominate America’s intellectual landscape, for the most part eclipsing the denominational colleges, and providing a top-down secular, intellectual revolution.  Since these new universities had graduate schools, the next generation of Ph.D.’s would repeat, on American soil, the German experience of the first generation of expatriated intellectuals.

In addition to beginning new universities from scratch, money flowed into secular universities through educational funds.  In 1902, Rockefeller’s General Education Board was founded with unimaginably large assets of $46 million. Less than ten years later, the Carnegie Corporation was founded with even larger assets of $151 million.  This seemingly endless supply of money was poured into the coffers of new universities and existing institutions willing to model themselves on the German research institutions and German intellectual life.

Interestingly enough, as Smith notes, sometimes endowments were not just pro-secular, but anti-religious.  In 1905 Andrew Carnegie gave ten million dollars to establish a professor’s pension fund. But “all denominational colleges and universities were categorically excluded from the plan; only schools with no formal ties to religious denominations could participate” (75).  Mr. Carnegie’s carrot had just the secularizing effect he desired. Fifteen colleges immediately cut ties to their denominational sponsors, including the prestigious Wesleyan, Dickinson, Swarthmore, Brown, Bowdoin, and Rutgers.

And so, it is not the addled imagination of fading religious reactionaries who place the secular revolution in colleges and universities.  It is a matter of historical fact that, in great part, the new secular American universities were designed from the very beginning as centers of secularist intellectual and cultural revolution.

It is then, in one sense, quite accurate to locate the source of the 1960s cultural revolution in the universities, as many conservatives do.  But in another sense, it is inaccurate.  The college students of the 1960s did not start that revolution.  They were third generation revolutionaries.  It was their teachers’ teachers, who had been to Europe in the early 20th century who really firmly planted the secular revolution on our soil.

In upcoming emails of this series, we’ll explore both how the secular revolution occurred in education (focusing, in particular, on Christian Smith’s discipline, sociology), and some of the secular philosophers of Europe whose ideas were especially influential imports to our shore.






Responses to Deliver Us From Evil:

Thank you for your marvelous web articles. They are intelligent and balanced with a clear perspective. I am a parent of teen-aged children who are exposed to a daily barrage of Hollywood. You are helping me. - Doug Griffin, Ph.D. Quebec, Canada

Thank you very much for your candid and honest discussion on this issue and almost all the issues you have published. More power to you and God bless you. - Pastor Amor

Responses to other tothesource articles:

Allowing this type of a compromising article (Genesis Project) on your site is a definite indication that you are not truly Bible Believers, but simply bible thinkers. Either God's word is true or it isn't - What is it? - D.

Send your letter to the editor to

Click for a Printer Friendly Version
left links right
Latest in college education: Sex Week
Poison Ivy?
about tothesource
We live complex lives. We strive to sort out priorities that sometimes conflict or seem incompatible. A moral framework is needed to help us understand the reality around us. Our Judeo-Christian heritage provides a framework to help us comprehend the choices we make and the conflicts that arise over them. It is not only the main source of our spiritual values, but also many of the secular values we depend on.

tothesource is a forum for integrating thinking and action within a moral framework that takes into account our contemporary situation. We will report the insights of cultural experts to the specific issues we face believing these sources will embolden people to greater faith and action.
subscribe email a friend
We invite you to subscribe to our free email service
that features informed opinion on current cultural issues.
Ben Wiker  Trans Benjamin Wiker
Benjamin Wiker holds a Ph.D. in Theological Ethics from Vanderbilt University, and has taught at Marquette University, St. Mary's University (MN), and Thomas Aquinas College (CA).

He is now a Lecturer in Theology and Science at Franciscan University of Steubenville (OH), and a full-time, free-lance writer. Dr. Wiker is a Senior Fellow of Discovery Institute and a Senior Fellow at the St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology. He writes regularly for a variety of journals.

Dr. Wiker just released a new book called Architects of the Culture of Death (Ignatius). His first book, Moral Darwinism: How We Became Hedonists, was released in the spring of 2002 (InterVarsity Press). He has written another book on Intelligent Design for InterVarsity Press called The Meaningful World: How the Arts and Sciences Reveal the Genius of Nature (due out in Spring 2006).
tothesource, P.O. Box 1292, Thousand Oaks, CA 91358
Phone: (805) 241-3138 | Fax: (805) 241-3158 |

This email was sent to If you feel you have received this in error or you do not wish to receive future articles from us, please reply with the word REMOVE in the subject line.